Archive for February, 2008

Spiritual Dimension of Sustainable Development

Monday, February 25th, 2008

Dear HumanDHS network friends

Please find below the Feruary 2008 Newsletter of Solidarity, Sustainability, and Non-Violence.

Kind regards
Brian Ward

Solidarity, Sustainability, and Non-Violence, February 2008
http://pelicanweb.org/solisustv04n02.html

Main theme: SPIRITUAL DIMENSION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Contents include:

1. Religious Freedom and the U.N. Millennium Development Goals
2. Religion as a Primarily Human Initiative
3. Spirituality as a Primarily Divine Initiative
4. A Critical Analysis of Patriarchy and Patriarchal Religions
5. The Democratic Alternative to Patriarchal Governance
6. The Spirituality of Sustainable Development
7. Update on Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom Resources
8. Prayer, Study, and Action (with letter by Erica Jong)
9. Links to Archived Newsletters and Other Resources

INVITED PAPER by Aaron Milavec, Catherine of Siena Virtual College
http://pelicanweb.org/solisustv04n02milavec.html

Please forward this notice to anyone who might be interested.

Any comments, questions, or concerns — please get in touch.

Sincerely,
Luis

Luis T. Gutierrez, PhD
Editor, SSNV Research Newsletter
http://pelicanweb.org/solisust.html

9th International Conference on Social Representations

Monday, February 25th, 2008

Dear HumanDHS network friends

Please find below information on the 9th International Conference on Social Representations.

Kind regards
Brian Ward

9th International Conference on Social Representations
Bali-Indonesia, 30th of June - 5th of July 2008

The deadline for abstract submissions: 31 March, 2008 *

Conference website: http://www.9icsr-indonesia.net/

Contact: info[@]9icsr-Indonesia.net

Dear colleagues,

We would like to invite you to the 9th International Conference on
Social Representations which will take place in Bali, June 30th -July
5th, 2008, under the the theme ‘Alternative Productions of Knowledge
and Social Representations’.

This conference is an academic tradition aimed at developing the
Social Representations Theory, formulated by Professor Serge
Moscovici. The first meeting was held in Ravello, Italy, 1992. Held
once in every two years since then, the meetings have moved from
Ravello to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (1994) ; Aix-en-Provence, France
(1996) ; Mexico-City, Mexico (1998) ; Montreal, Canada (2000) ;
Stirling, Scotland (2002) ; Guadalajara, Mexico (2004), and Rome, Italy (2006).

For their first eight meetings, the conference regularly took place
alternatively in Europe and America, mostly in South America. This is
because the theory has been blossoming most quickly on those two
continents, from where it has to touch other disciplines and other in
this part of the world. The Bali conference, then, will be the first
to take place in Asia. With Indonesia as its host, Asia will be taking
its first step towards becoming a region for the theory’s further
development in this region.

As with the earlier eight, this conference has managed to catch the
attention of many academics, researchers and practitioners, not only
from the sphere of social psychology, from which this theory has been
articulated, but also from other fields such as sociology,
anthropology, history, culture, communication etc which has been
integrated into this approach at the theoretical, empirical, and application levels.

*Professor Serge Moscovici* himself, as the founder of this theory,
will be present and deliver his speech in this 9th International
Conference on Social Representations in Bali, along with other guest speakers.

Unlike what has been customary in the previous eight conferences, the
9th International Conference on Social Representations will be held
between the end of June and early July 2008.

We have to admit that the Olympic Games, which will be held in China
in August, has compelled the organizers to reconsider the usual
schedule, which usually falls between the end of August and early September.
September has not been chosen because early September will be fasting
time in this country, the majority of whose population is Muslim.

The choice of Bali as the venue for next year’s conference also has to
do with the fact that the weather there would likely be at its best at
that time of the year, with the cool winter breezes from Australia
tempering the island’s tropical climate.

Therefore, we would like to invite your contribution and participation
in the conference, which will consist of symposiums, thematic group
discussions, a round table meetings, interactive poster sessions,
contributions, and also presentations by guest speakers who are well
known in the development this theory.

One of the new traditions that we will introduce in this upcoming 9th
International Conference on Social Representation is the Scientific
Competition for Young Researchers. The Scientific Committee will
select three young researchers and invite them to present their work
in a special session in this conference. Hopefully, this new event
will mark the participation of young researchers in international
forums, which enable their work to stand at a level that is equal to
that of their predecessors.

See you in Bali.

Denise Jodelet
(Honorary President)

Risa Permanadeli
(Chairperson of The Conference)

Mailing Address:
Departemen Susastra
Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya - Universitas Indonesia Gedung III
Lt.1 Kampus UI - Depok 16424, Indonesia

Phone:
62 21 7863528/29
Faximile:
62 21 7590 6380
email
info[@]9icsr-Indonesia.net

UNESCO’s Seminar on Challenges of Regional Integration in West Africa

Thursday, February 21st, 2008

Dear HumanDHS network friends

Please find below information on the last UNESCO Seminar on regional integration in West Africa.

Kind regards
Brian Ward

UNESCO’s Seminar on Challenges of Regional Integration in West Africa
Nigeria hosts the 15th and last national seminar of UNESCO’s project on the challenges of regional integration in West Africa.

UNESCO and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) are organizing a seminar from 26 to 28 February 2008 in Lagos (Nigeria) on the subject of “Nation-states and the challenges of regional integration in West Africa: the Nigerian case”.

The opening ceremony will be chaired by Pierre Sané, UNESCO Assistant Director-General for Social and Human Sciences, in the presence of representatives from the project’s different partners, who have implemented it over the past three years within the framework of UNESCO’s Management of Social Transformations programme: West African Economic and Monetary Union, African Union, OECD, ECOBANK, the United Nations University and Trust Africa.

Building upon the participation of all the scientific coordinators of the 15 ECOWAS Member States, where similar meetings had already taken place, this seminar will explore the specificity of Nigeria where ECOWAS’ Headquarters are located, to reflect collectively on the challenges and potential of this country’s integration into the area of regional cooperation created in 1975.

Following meetings held in Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Togo, the 15th meeting will mark the end of a series of seminars launched in 2005. Each meeting will have lead to the publication of a book by the Karthala Publishing Company.

Covering all 15 ECOWAS Member States, the project has provided an opportunity to initiate, in each of them - and often for the first time - a dialogue between researchers, political stake-holders and actors of economic and social development in order to understand the reasons behind the slow progress of an integration process, which is essential to lift West African countries out of their ‘maldevelopment’.

One of the major outcomes of the initiative was the unanimous adoption by the ECOWAS Heads of State Summit in January 2008 of the project proposal for the creation of a West Africa Institute which should be established in Praia (Cape Verde). In charge of conducting research on regional integration in West Africa, the aim of the institute is to increase knowledge on the subject and to propose political options in favour of development, peace and human rights in the region.

The Project’s Steering Committee will hold its first meeting immediately after the national seminar of Nigeria on 29 February in Lagos (Nigeria ).

· Provisional agenda (PDF, also available in French)

· Provisional list of participants (PDF in French)

· Report of the first seminar of the MOST Project in West Africa, Dakar, Senegal, 20-22 March
2006 (PDF in French)

· Final Report of the first seminar of the MOST Project in Cape Verde, Praia, Cape Verde, 4-5 April
2007 (PDF in French and Portuguese)

For more information on this event or to contact with the scientific coordinators in the ECOWAS countries, please see below:

· Boubacar Barry, MOST regional coordinator: bbarry@orange.sn, tél. : (221) 824 93 01 / (221)
605 34 86

· Abayomi Akinyeye, MOST coordinator in Nigeria: yakinyeye@yahoo.com, tel.: (234) 802 337 66
25 / (234) 803 362 32 20

Quick link to the UNESCO-SHS webpage on the event: www.unesco.org/shs/most/regional_integration/nigeria

Common Ground News Bulletin for 12-18 February 2008

Thursday, February 21st, 2008

Dear HumanDHS network friends

Please find below the Common Ground News Bulletin for 12-18 February 2008

Kind regards
Brian Ward

Common Ground News Service Partners in Humanity
for constructive & vibrant Muslim-Western relations

12 - 18 February 2008

The Common Ground News Service – Partners in Humanity (CGNews-PiH) aims to promote constructive perspectives and dialogue about Muslim–Western relations. CGNews-PiH is available in Arabic, English, French, Indonesian and Urdu.

For an archive of past CGNews articles and other information, please visit our website at www.commongroundnews.org .

Unless otherwise noted, copyright permission has been obtained and articles may be reprinted by any news outlet or publication. Please acknowledge both the original source and the Common Ground News Service (CGNews).

Inside this edition

1) Where freedom is relative by Diana Ferrero
In this fourth article in our series on freedom of expression, Diana Ferrero, a producer for Al Jazeera, discusses her documentary, They Call Me Muslim, which follows the narratives of an Iranian women who wishes she were not forced to wear a headscarf, and a French-women who wishes she could.
(Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 12 February 2008)

2) Who speaks for Islam? by John L. Esposito and Dalia Mogahed
John L. Esposito, a Georgetown University Professor and Dalia Mogahed a Gallup Senior Analyst give voice to 1.3 billion Muslims around the world – the “silenced majority” – in their new book Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think.
(Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 12 February 2008)

3) A new world peace initiative by Saboor Syed
Islamabad-based freelance journalist Saboor Syed considers the increasing militancy in the Muslim world, and the increasing propensity of media sources to refer to Islam as a religion of intolerance and violence. Syed looks at religious and historical examples of constructive religious plurality and calls for an international, inter-religious movement for a just peace.
(Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 12 February 2008)

4) Shi’a meets Sunni in a Baghdad park by Bassim Al-Shara
In war-stricken Baghdad, Bassim Al-Shara, an IWPR contributor, finds a unique venue for peace and reconciliation. The famous Al-Zawra Park – a popular gathering point – provides respite from the tensions between the city’s Sunni and Shi’a residents.
(Source: IWPR, 17 January 2008)

5) US elections through Arab American eyes by Ghassan Rubeiz
Ghassan Rubeiz, a Lebanese-American Middle East analyst, examines the diverse political interests of Arab Americans in the presidential race for the White House.
(Source: Daily Star, 8 February 2007)

1)Where freedom is relative
Diana Ferrero

Tehran - As she opened the door and welcomed me into her home on a snowy morning in Tehran, “K.” (her name is withheld to protect her anonymity) – a 33-year-old mother – appeared to me as an unexpected epiphany. A brunette, speaking fluent English in a surprising American accent, she was wearing only skimpy shorts and a clingy tank top, showing her bare skin and her boyish haircut.

That day, K. talked to me on camera for three hours straight. She spoke freely, without hesitation, giving me the most outspoken, courageous and defiant interview I could ever hope for as a journalist in Iran.

“No, I am not afraid” she said at the end – while I was rolling my last tape. “These are my thoughts, and there is nothing I said that I cannot take the consequences for…. I am actually very happy I told you about myself.”

I only had two weeks in Iran. I travelled there alone with my Italian passport, hoping to shoot the second part of my first documentary, They Call Me Muslim, a project I undertook as a Fulbright fellow at Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism.

But it’s tough to make a movie in Iran – especially for a woman. I had to wear a hijab, or Muslim headscarf, and remain inconspicuous as I gathered footage. Shooting scenes on the subway, on the street and at illegal late-night parties was risky, because the Iranian police patrol the streets and watch women closely to enforce the dress code.

The toughest part was in fact access: finding women who were willing to tell me their stories.

Before my departure, I had lined up several interviews through Iranian-American contacts in California. But when I got to Iran, my main source was too scared to participate in the project, so I started conducting private meetings with other women – lawyers, filmmakers, journalists, bloggers, photographers – and finally K., a woman who felt a documentary could move beyond stereotypes and give the Western world an accurate portrait of Iranian women.

But Iran was only half of the story.

They Call Me Muslim is a tale of two women struggling for their individual freedom – one who wants to wear the hijab, another who wants to take it off.

Samah, a French Muslim girl in Paris, feels naked without her hijab, but was banned from wearing it in the classroom. K., on the contrary, wouldn’t wear the hijab if she weren’t forced to do so by the regime.

I shot the film from December 2004 to January 2005. The idea for the project struck me about a year before when France enacted a controversial law banning religious symbols, including the hijab, in public schools. The law generated only minor interest in the United States but sparked a fiery debate in France. I started imagining the dilemma some Muslim girls were going through as they faced a dramatic choice between religious belief and education.

Having lived in Paris myself as a teenager, I was intrigued by what was going on in France. The law on religious symbols affected some 800 Muslim girls, and a few who refused to take off the hijab were even expelled from school. It seemed paradoxical that a country like France – one of the true models of democracy in the West and a country so deeply rooted in the revolutionary principles of Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité – was expelling girls from public schools for exercising their Liberté on a personal matter. France seemed to be denying its people one of the basic principles and foundations of democracy.

Through this film, I wanted to explore freedom of choice in both cultures, East and West, though neither is of course monolithic. I wanted to give voice to a minority, fighting against discriminatory laws. In France, girls who wanted to wear the hijab were seen as rebels. But in Iran, the rebels were girls who dared to walk down the street wearing tiny, transparent and slippery headscarves. I wanted those women to speak for themselves. And the final message – if there is one – is the need for women to be free to choose, to find their own voices, and to dialogue with each other for a better understanding.

After seeing the film, both K. and Samah expressed respect for each other’s position. While Samah didn’t see Iran as a model for Islam because in her opinion women should not be forced to wear the hijab, K. felt French secularism – as a foundation of democracy – could be better appreciated if one lived in a country like Iran. In fact, she even hinted about the desire to move to France one day.

###

* Diana Ferrero, a native of Rome, is a reporter and producer currently working in Washington, DC for Al Jazeera’s new English-language channel. This article is part of a series on freedom of expression written for the Common Ground News Service.

Source: Common Ground News Service, 12 February 2008, www.commongroundnews.org
Copyright permission is granted for publication.

2)Who speaks for Islam?
John L. Esposito and Dalia Mogahed

Washington, DC - Extremists and terrorism have too often monopolised the media’s coverage and thus the message coming out of the Muslim world. But what do the vast majority of mainstream Muslims really believe, think, and feel? What are their hopes, fears, and resentments? Why is it that a robust anti-Americanism seems to pervade the Muslim world? Is it the sign of a clash of cultures – do they hate who we are? Or is it what we do? Rather than listening to extremists or simply relying on the opinions of individual pundits, why not give voice to the silenced majority?

We asked Muslims around the world what they really think and discovered that when we let the data lead the discourse, a number of insights are revealed. The most important finding from our research was this: conflict between Muslim and Western communities is far from inevitable. It is more about policy than principles. However, until and unless decision-makers listen directly to the people and gain an accurate understanding of this conflict, extremists on all sides will continue to gain ground.

Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think is based on six years of research and more than 50,000 interviews representing 1.3 billion Muslims who reside in more than 35 nations that are predominantly Muslim or have sizable Muslim populations. Representing more than 90% of the world’s Muslim community, this poll is the largest, most comprehensive study of its kind. The results defy conventional wisdom and the inevitability of a global conflict – even as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan continue.

The study revealed some surprising findings. It showed that Muslims and Americans are equally likely to reject attacks on civilians as morally unjustifiable. Those who do choose violence and extremism are driven by politics, not poverty or piety. In fact, of the 7 percent of responders who did believe 9/11 was justified, none of them hated our freedom; they want our freedom. However, they believe that America, and the West in general, operate with a double standard and stand in the way of Muslims determining their own future.

We are constantly bombarded with images of angry Muslim teens partaking in violent demonstrations or being trained in Al Qaeda camps. This study showed, however, that the vast majority of young Muslims aren’t dreaming of going to war; they are dreaming of finding work. Similarly, when asked about their hopes for the future, Muslims of all ages said they want better jobs and security, not conflict and violence.

The findings also revealed that Muslims across the world want neither secularism nor theocracy. They want freedom, rights and democratisation. At the same time, however, they claim that society should be built upon religious Islamic values and that the shari’a (Islamic law) should be a source of law. Simply put, the majority of Muslim women and men want rights and religion, and they don’t see the two as being mutually exclusive.

The West will be pleased to learn that nine out of ten Muslims are moderates – good news for those optimistic about co-existence. Muslims say the most important thing Westerners can do to improve relations with their societies is to change their negative views toward Muslims, respect Islam and re-evaluate foreign policies.

The unfortunate news is that there is a large number of politically radicalised Muslims (the 7 percent previously mentioned, which translates to approximately 91 million individuals) that could be pushed to support or perpetrate violence against civilians. Challenges for the West will only grow as long as these Muslims continue to feel politically dominated and disregarded.

###

* John L. Esposito is a Georgetown University Professor and Director of the Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding. Dalia Mogahed is a Gallup Senior Analyst and Executive Director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies. This article is written for the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) and was first printed in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette.

Source: Common Ground News Service, 12 February 2008, www.commongroundnews.org
Copyright permission is granted for publication.

3)A new world peace initiative
Saboor Syed

Islamabad - Worldwide attention has for some time now been focused on media sources that paint Islam as an ideology that causes unrest, turmoil and mayhem in the world at present.

Religious plurality in this world is willed by God, as is stated in the Qur’an. It equates the unlawful killing of a person – Muslim or non-Muslim – with the killing of all of humanity. The Qur’an also clearly calls for reconciliation during times of conflict. The Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) extended the greeting of peace to all without distinction, his actions serving as an example to Muslims.

In Islam, war is permitted for Muslims only as a last resort and only under three conditions: in self-defence, for the removal of a tyrannical force or against those who breach a pact or agreement.

Even after engaging in war with non-Muslims, Muslims must never prevent them from practicing their religion. British historian and Middle East expert Karen Armstrong acknowledges that after conquering Jerusalem in 637 AD, Caliph Omar declined the offer to pray in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre by the Archbishop of Jerusalem, fearing it might prompt Muslims to commemorate the event by erecting a mosque at the site of the church at some later date.

In his book, More in Common Than You Think, Dr. William Baker explains that when the Jews were being persecuted in Europe during the Middle Ages, they found peace, harmony, and acceptance among the Muslim people of Spain. In fact, Jews themselves refer to this era of Jewish history as the “Golden Age”.

If these examples illustrate Islam’s principal position on war and violence, why then is the Muslim world currently presenting a different image, leading many in the West to think that violence and terrorism are the hallmarks of Islam?

The issue of Muslims engaged in militancy must be viewed in context, and not in isolation. Palestinians have been denied their right to an independent state notwithstanding the existence of several UN resolutions in this regard. Similarly, UN Security Council resolutions giving Kashmiris the right to self-determination remain unimplemented. In many cases, Muslims – be they Palestinians, Kashmiris, Afghans, or Iraqis – believe they are fighting in self-defence and to regain the usurped right of independence and freedom.

Thus, it needs to be reiterated that peace never exists in vacuum – it is in fact the ultimate outcome of justice. Where there is injustice, there is bound to be violence and terrorism. Hence, unless injustice is rooted out, there can be no real peace in the world.

We must launch an international movement to arrest the menace of violence and turmoil in the world today. Based on the principal of “no peace without justice”, the movement must stand for those who are oppressed and victimised, no matter politically or otherwise, without any heed to their faith, colour and creed.

Commanding huge respect from their followers, top religious voices – such as clergy and scholars – must come forward to shape and lead this movement by establishing a regional and international network. Taking the lead from synchronised international protest demonstrations against war and violence, this peace movement should make a principal decision to oppose war and bloodletting in every case and organise mass protests in case of any such eventuality.

One can safely claim that such a movement is bound to elicit a positive response from the adherents of different religions who can emerge as strong pressure groups to force their respective governments to avoid indulging in violence or supporting an unjust war anywhere in the world.

Since Islam is routinely blamed for the present spate of violence in the media, the onus is on its worldwide acclaimed and respected voices to come forward and take the lead in organising this movement. With all religious voices speaking out as one, this movement can act as a shield against those forces working toward violence and confrontation.

###

* Saboor Syed is an Islamabad-based freelance journalist who has worked with several different developmental and advocacy organisations. This article is written for the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) and can be accessed at www.commongroundnews.org .

Source: Common Ground News Service, 12 February 2008, www.commongroundnews.org
Copyright permission is granted for publication.

4)Shi’a meets Sunni in a Baghdad park
Bassim Al-Shara

Baghdad - Mohammed Omar Ali sits on a bench under a tree in Al-Zawra Park, looking around impatiently for any sign of his friend. Ali, 31, has not seen Ayad Murtadha for almost a year since he and his family, who are Shi’a Muslims, were forced to leave the Baghdad neighbourhood where the two friends grew up together.

Murtadha, 32, is Sunni, but sectarianism has not affected his friendship with Ali. When the men finally reunite with tears, hugs and non-stop conversation, it is clear that the capital’s sectarian battles have failed to break the bond.

According to the United Nations refugee agency UNCHR, more than 700,000 Iraqis have been displaced by sectarian violence since 2006. Many of the capital’s once mixed areas have become either purely Sunni or purely Shi’a after militias forced families out for belonging to the other religious branch of Islam.

Improved security in Baghdad has enabled Sunni and Shi’a friends to once again spend time together in safety. However, many are still reluctant to visit particular neighbourhoods where one sect dominates and are instead choosing to meet in Al-Zawra Park.

“These get-togethers are the only thing that makes us optimistic about the future,” said Murtadha.

Al-Zawra is a famous 10 square-kilometer park located near Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone. The park’s centralised location and the tight security in the area have made this a popular gathering point for Baghdad residents of all sects and ethnicities.

Lines of people waiting to enter the park stretch for hundreds of metres at weekends. Park officials say the number of visitors has soared from just a few thousand per month in early 2006 when violence was on the rise in the capital, to over 1.5 million in December 2007 when Iraq was celebrating the major holiday Eid al-Adha.

“The park is so well protected that it’s very hard for militias or terrorists to infiltrate it,” said the official.

Cars must pass through several checkpoints on the approaches to the park, and all visitors are searched before they enter.

Mohammad Sad, 27, a university student from the Sunni-dominated Al-Adhamiyah neighbourhood, said the park is the only place where people do not have to fear the militias based in other Baghdad neighbourhoods.

Sad frequently meets up with Shi’a friends in the park.

“When you enter Al-Zawra Park, you have a special feeling,” he said. “You feel like you are no longer in Baghdad because it is so mixed with people from different sects.”

Sad said he took a position against Shi’a Muslims after he heard that the Mahdi Army – the powerful militia of the firebrand Shi’a cleric Muqtada al-Sadr – was killing Sunnis.
“Sometimes I even hated my Shi’a friends,” he said. “But when I thought about my childhood and my memories with them, I realised that they had nothing to do with what was happening.”

For sociologist Ahmad Dhiya, these reunions are a positive sign that the country will survive sectarianism.

“Young people in Baghdad need a life without violence, and they’re tired of the sectarianism that the various armed groups propagate,” he said.

Dhiya said the park provides an important social outlet for Iraqis and believes it is helping to repair rifts among the capital’s fractured population.

Some Baghdad residents interviewed by the Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR) acknowledged that the sectarian violence has tainted relationships between Sunni and Shi’a.

Raid Jafar, a 30 year-old Shi’a from the Baya neighbourhood, said that although he is happy to meet his Sunni friends in the park, he admitted that he does not trust Sunnis as much he did in the past.

Jafar said his feelings towards his Sunni friends changed after his brother was killed by Al-Qaeda militants in a neighbourhood called Al-Sayidiyah.

“I was so angry that I thought seriously about killing any Sunni in revenge,” he said.

He now tries to avoid talking about politics or his brother’s death with his Sunni friends, instead concentrating on personal issues, gossip and work.

Still, Jafar said that he hopes that sectarian rifts will heal and that “what is left of the relations between the two sects will be protected.”

Others have similar hopes.

“There is a small bright light coming out from the darkness in Iraq,” said Sad. “It is slowly getting bigger and brighter.”

###

* Bassim Al-Shara is an IWPR contributor in Baghdad. This article originally appeared in the Iraqi Crisis Report, produced by the Institute for War and Peace Reporting. www.iwpr.net. This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) and can be accessed at www.commongroundnews.org .

Source: IWPR, 17 January 2008, www.iwpr.net.
Copyright permission is granted for publication.

5)US elections through Arab American eyes
Ghassan Rubeiz

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida - There are about 3.5 million Arab Americans. According to a 2007 Zogby poll, 61 percent of Arab American voters mention Iraq as the leading issue in the election, and 66 percent also rank “Palestine” as very high on their list of concerns.

In the past, Arab Americans – especially the more affluent – voted Republican. Currently, however, the same poll 62 percent of Arab Americans vote Democratic and 25 percent vote Republican.

In the vote on Super Tuesday, 5 February, Democrats confirmed two liberal presidential candidates as the front-runner nominees: Hilary Clinton with 1045 delegates (out of the 2025 required for winning the nomination) and Barack Obama with 960 delegates. Ron Paul, the only “dovish” Republican candidate that Arabs tend to support, is likely to soon vanish from the race.

A few days before Super Tuesday, the Arabs took an electronic straw poll, sponsored by Al Jazeera. Al Jazeera viewers – who are for the most part Arabs or interested in Arab affairs – were asked to vote electronically for their choice for US president. A majority of Arabs, 61 percent, voted for Obama; Ron Paul came in at a distant second, with 10 percent.

“Arab Americans should be greatly encouraged by last Tuesday’s Democratic primary results,” says Abdeen Jabara, a civil rights attorney and the former President of Arab American Anti-Discrimination Committee. Jabara continues, “Senator Obama’s … message of change is resonating with large segments of an American public, of which Arab Americans are a part, who are deeply unsatisfied by the status quo and the business-as-usual prescriptions for America’s foreign and domestic policy ills. This was a truly historic day and Arab Americans can be proud of the part they played in it.”

Maysoon Haddad, an Iraqi American, is fascinated by Super Tuesday. She represents many Arab Americans and many people living abroad who are impressed with Americans’ respect for the rule of law in electing politicians: “As an American originally from Iraq, I watch Super Tuesday, admire the system, appreciate real democracy and hope to see the same thing happening in Iraq.”

Haddad holds a Republican point of view on the continued US military presence in her home country, Iraq: “I’m looking for a president who supports the war wholeheartedly; a president who doesn’t want to rapidly decrease the United States presence in Iraq. A quick troop withdrawal is asking for trouble.”

The Arab American community of Dearborn, Michigan, is 300,000 strong and diverse in ethnicity and its views on politics. M. Kay Siblani, the Executive Director of Dearborn Weekly: The Arab American News, supports Obama as the candidate who will overhaul American politics. Siblani says, “Super Tuesday proved that Arab Americans and American Muslims must forge ties with African American voters. They must all work harder together to get Barack Obama elected.”

In Washington, Subhi Ghandour runs a centre for political and cultural dialogue. His electronic newsletter, Alhewar, is well respected and has a wide circulation among Arab intellectuals. In a conversation with him about the US elections, he explained that Arabs do not have a better choice than Obama “in dealing with the Arab-Israeli peace process, ending the Iraq occupation with diplomacy and opening channels of dialogue with Iran and Syria.”

Obama, as a community organiser, appreciates the power of listening and respect of the adversary. He realises that the Syrian and Iranian regimes are challenging, but he knows that they have real issues worth negotiating. Ghandour added that Obama cannot be expected to see the entire world through a Palestine lens, and that “Arab Americans must chose among the existing candidates, even if there is no ideal custom-made candidate to fully suit Arab requirements.”

Obama is a reliable defender of Israel, but he believes that the longer Israel delays a final resolution of the conflict the less secure it will become. Similarly, he knows that the Palestinians can only win their struggle by concentrating on a strategy of non-violence and civil empowerment.

Arab sentiments on Obama are not at all uniform, especially among Palestinians. The Electronic Intifada, a Palestinian activist website, angrily criticised the senator from Illinois, who “offered not a single word of criticism of Israel, of its relentless settlement and wall construction, of the closures that make life unliveable for millions of Palestinians.”

On Super Tuesday, the midpoint in the race, Obama came close to matching Clinton’s popularity, and has since become the front-runner following the next set of primaries. Many of his supporters believe that he will continue to gain momentum over the next few months and be chosen as the Democratic candidate to face McCain, the likely Republican nominee.

Obama’s Arab American supporters see that a man with such a diverse international, interfaith, and inter-racial background is bound to make America more inclusive – both domestically and globally. He is a Christian American with the gift of respect and appreciation for Islam. He is a US leader and a citizen of the global village.

For Arab Americans, the 2008 presidential election offers a strategic opportunity to tie America with the Arab world not through war and fear of terror, but through ideas and aspirations.

###

* Dr. Ghassan Rubeiz ( grubeiz@comcast.net ) is a Lebanese-American Middle East analyst. He was previously the Secretary of the Geneva-based World Council of Churches for the Middle East. This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) and can be accessed at www.commongroundnews.org .

Source: Daily Star, 8 February 2007, www.dailystar.com.lb
Copyright permission is granted for publication.

Youth Views

CGNews-PiH also regularly publishes the work of student leaders and journalists whose articles strengthen intercultural understanding and promote constructive perspectives and dialogue in their own communities. Student journalists and writers under the age of 27 are encouraged to write to Nancy Batakji ( nancybatakji@gmail.com ) for more information on contributing.

About CGNews-PiH

The Common Ground News Service - Partners in Humanity (CGNews-PiH) provides news, op-eds, features and analysis by local and international experts on a broad range of issues affecting Muslim-Western relations. CGNews-PiH syndicates articles that are constructive, offer hope and promote dialogue and mutual understanding, to news outlets worldwide. With support from the British, Norwegian, Swedish and US Governments, the United States Institute of Peace, the National Endowment for Democracy and private donors, the service is a non-profit initiative of Search for Common Ground, an international NGO working in the fields of conflict transformation and media production.

This news service is one outcome of a set of working meetings held in partnership with His Royal Highness Prince El Hassan bin Talal of Jordan in June 2003.

The Common Ground News Service also commissions and distributes solution-oriented articles by local and international experts to promote constructive perspectives and encourage dialogue about current Middle East issues. This service, Common Ground News Service - Middle East (CGNews-ME), is available in Arabic, English, and Hebrew. To subscribe, click here.

The views expressed in these articles are those of the authors, not of CGNews or its affiliates.

Common Ground News Service
1601 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite #200
Washington, DC 20009 USA
Ph: +1(202) 265-4300
Fax: +1(202) 232-6718

Rue Belliard 205 Bte 13 B-1040
Brussels, Belgium
Ph: +32(02) 736-7262
Fax: +32(02) 732-3033

Email : cgnewspih@sfcg.org
Website : www.commongroundnews.org

Dignity International - Monthly Newsbulletin - February 2008

Monday, February 18th, 2008

Dear HumanDHS network friends

Please find below a link to the February 2008 Newsletter of Dignity International.

Kind regards
Brian Ward

DIGNITY INTERNATIONAL
MONTHLY NEWSBULLETIN - February 2008

Full Newsletter at www.dignityinternational.org

Contents:

Dignity News

* South Asia Regional Linking & Learning Programme

* Latin America Regional Programme Alumnus Elected President of CONAIE

Act Now!

* Support Human Rights Defenders in Morocco

* Ensure Safety and Protection for Adivasi Migrant Workers – India

* Bangladesh : Risk of violent suppression

Other News

* World Social Forum: World Economic Forum 2008 - A Tale of “ One City: One World”

* Social Audit, Rajisthan, India

* The European Anti Poverty Network (EAPN) response to the Lisbon

Implementation Reports

* Alliance of Civilisations Launched in Madrid

* Open Ended Working Group

Publications

* COHRE Manual on the Right to Water and Sanitation

* COHRE Housing & ESC Rights Law Quarterly

* Oxfam America-CARE USA Rights-based Approaches Learning Project Report

* “The Road to Doha” NGLS/FFDO Joint Publication

Announcements

* ESCR-Net 2008 International Strategy Meeting and General Assembly Postponed

* Nominations for COHRE 2008 Housing Rights Awards

* A New Website for KIOS

Forthcoming Events – Highlights

* Citizenship in an Enlarged Europe the Contribution of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Lisbon

* Commission on the Status of Women (CSW)52nd Session

Otago University New Zealand - Professorial Chair in Peace and Conflict Studies

Monday, February 18th, 2008

Dear HumanDHS network friends

Please find below a newly established position open at the Otago University, New Zealand.

Kind regards
Brian Ward

Chair in Peace and Conflict Studies More Information
University of Otago
Dunedin, New Zealand

Applications are invited for the Chair in Peace and Conflict Studies. The successful appointee will also be the first Director of a National Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies. This is a new position resulting from an endowment by the Aotearoa New Zealand Peace and Conflict Studies Trust, under the University of Otago’s Leading Thinkers Initiative.

The University is seeking an exceptional individual whose accomplishments and reputation are consistent with an appointment at full Professor level, and who will take the lead in establishing the Centre as a research, teaching, and practice institution. The Professor will conduct and lead research on Peace and Conflict Studies, and will promote the culture of peaceful settlement of disputes in New Zealand and beyond through teaching and practice. The appointee will be affiliated with an appropriate academic department in the Division of Humanities and will be expected to contribute to teaching and supervision.

The successful candidate is likely to hold a PhD in a relevant field, and to have an excellent research output and a strong track record in obtaining research funding. The appointee will demonstrate outstanding leadership and communication skills, the ability to initiate and engage in peace and conflict-resolution practices, and a willingness to draw on indigenous peace traditions.

Applications close on 10 March 2008. Equal Opportunity in Employment is University Policy.

For more information please contact:
Patrick Rooney, Principal Consultant, Academic Search International
Email patrick.rooney[@]academic-search.net

Invitation to Participate in Field Research on Perceptions of Societies in Conflict

Monday, February 18th, 2008

Dear HumanDHS network friends

Please find below a note from Corinna Carmen Gayer and an invitation to participate in a research questionaire.

Kind regards
Brian Ward

Dear friends,

I am now starting with my field research concerning the societal perceptions of societies in conflict. For this reason, I am addressing this letter to you and would be glad to receive your help and support by forwarding this email and the attached document to your friends, acquaintances and collegues in Palestine.

My intention is to carry out interviews with 50 people in the age range from 25 to 35 years who are living in the areas of East-Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Ramallah, Hebron and the surroundings of these cities, using Q-technique and a standardized questionnaire. As a matter of course, the interview is strictly confidential and will only be used for academic purposes.

The entire interview is in written form and carried out in Arabic. It will take around 45 minutes. My co-worker, Elise A. will translate the instruction into Arabic and will be present together with me to answer possible questions of the interviewees.

People which are interested in participating in the interview, can find more information in the attached file ‘placard’ and can contact me under freieuniberlin@gmail.com. A modest courtesy will be offered to the interviewees for their efforts.

I would be very grateful if you took the time to forward this message to people that might or be willing to participate in the study or to those that might be able to assist me in establishing contact with people from the target group.

Thank you very much in advance and warmest greetings,

Corinna

Corinna Gayer
PhD-Fellow
Freie Universität Berlin
Peace- and Conflict Studies
Email: freieuniberlin[@]gmail.com

In Canada, the Schiavo Case with an Outrageous Twist

Saturday, February 16th, 2008

Dear HumanDHS Friends!

Comment by Brian Lynch:

Please note:

First let me say that I find this appalling and outside the bounds of what any self respecting “ethicists”might be involved in. The world is indeed dangerous form all angles. In other places I have written at length about the Schiavo case.


I would first say that it is unfortunate to even bring up that name. The press again muddles the waters by comparing the two cases . Each case is different with common elements. The common elements are what “Medical Ethics” have tried to and pretty much succeeded in parsing out over nearly forty years. Here none of that is being paid attention to.


This seems to be pure autocracy. It is also unfortunately the logical conclusion for some of the thinking of some people like Leon Kass who is a self respecting “ethicist” who has long supported a “duty to die” or at least suggested it.

Please see “comments if interested in the rest of these remarks and their relevance to “humiliation” Thank you.

Start of the article:In Canada, the Schiavo case with an outrageous twist

By Jonathan Rosenblum

An elderly Orthodox Jew is on life support. His children have adamantly opposed his removal from the ventilator and feeding tube, on the grounds that Jewish law expressly forbids any action designed to shorten life. If their father could express his wishes, they say, he would certainly oppose the doctors acting to deliberately terminate his life. The director of the ICU told the children that neither their father’s wishes nor their own are relevant, and he would do whatever he decided was appropriate

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | A Winnipeg case currently winding its way to its grim conclusion pits the children of Samuel Golubchuk against doctors at the Salvation Army Grace General Hospital. According to the pleadings, Golubchuk’s doctors informed his children that their 84-year-old father is “in the process of dying” and that they intended to hasten the process by removing his ventilation, and if that proved insufficient to kill him quickly, to also remove his feeding tube. In the event that the patient showed discomfort during these procedures, the chief of the hospital’s ICU unit stated in his affidavit that he would administer morphine.

Golubchuk is an Orthodox Jew, as are his children. The latter have adamantly opposed his removal from the ventilator and feeding tube, on the grounds that Jewish law expressly forbids any action designed to shorten life, and that if their father could express his wishes, he would oppose the doctors acting to deliberately terminate his life.

In response, the director of the ICU informed Golubchuk’s children that neither their father’s wishes nor their own are relevant, and he would do whatever he decided was appropriate. Bill Olson, counsel for the ICU director, told the Canadian Broadcasting Company that physicians have the sole right to make decisions about treatment — even if it goes against a patient’s religious beliefs — and that “there is no right to a continuation of treatment.”

That position was supported by Dr. Jeff Blackner, executive director of the office of ethics of the Canadian Medical Association. He told Reuters: “[W]e want to make sure that clinical decisions are left to physicians and not judges.” Doctors’ decisions are made only with the “best interest of the individual patient at heart,” he said, though he did not explain how that could be squared with the undisputed claim that this patient would oppose the doctors’ decision. Meanwhile, an Angus Reid poll of Canadians showed that 68% supported leaving the final decision with the family.

See rest of article

Brian Lynch Who We Are

brianlynchmd.com

Consultancy Services Required for Evaluation of IAMA Project

Thursday, February 14th, 2008

Dear HumanDHS network friends

Please find below an invitation to tender to evaluate a project ‘Integration: A Multifaith Approach’ (IAMA).

Kind regards
Brian Ward

The International Organization for Migration, Regional Office in Helsinki wishes to contract: CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR CONDUCTING AN EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT “Integration: A Multifaith Approach” (IAMA)

The transnational IAMA project pilots the provision of civic education training to religious community leaders in a multifaith context. The overall objective of the evaluation is to assess the efficacy of this approach for advancing the integration of migrant religious community leaders and their communities. The IAMA project is co-financed by the European Community under the INTI Programme - Preparatory Actions for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals.

Interested individuals and organisations are referred to the complete CALL FOR TENDERS at http://iom.fi/files/vacancy2008/EXTENDED_Call_for_Tenders_IOM_Helsinki_IAMA_project_30Jan08.pdf
Tenders must be submitted by 15 February 2008 at the latest.
Tobias van Treeck Project Development and Information Assistant
International Organization for Migration IOM
Regional Office for the Baltic and Nordic States,
and the European Neighbourhood countries (East)
Unioninkatu 13, 6th Floor
P.O.BOX 851,
FI-00101 Helsinki, FINLAND
Tel.:+358-(0)9-684 11533
tvantreeck[@]iom.int
www.iom.fi

New Book: Enduring Creation by Nigel Spivey

Thursday, February 14th, 2008

Dear HumanDHS network friends

Please find here information on the book ‘Enduring Creation’

Kind regards
Brian Ward

‘Enduring Creation’

Nigel Spivey takes on one of the greatest taboos in Western culture in this brilliantly original work of cultural history: why is so much pain depicted in the art of the West? Beginning with a meditation on Auschwitz, the prizewinning author then takes us on a journey that encompasses the stone-bound screams of classical sculpture, the many depictions of the Crucifixion, the Massacre of the Innocents and St. Sebastians pierced with arrows, self-portraits of the aging Rembrandt, and the tortured art of Vincent van Gogh. Exploring the tender, complex rapport between art and pain, Spivey guides us through the twentieth-century photographs of casualties of war, Edvard Munch’s The Scream, and back to the recorded horrors of the Holocaust.

Beauty and disfigurement, violence and thrill, horror and comfort–these are pairings fostered throughout Western art, for causes as various as religious martyrdom, judicial torment, artistic virtuosity, and erotic gratification. The ancient Greeks invented tragic drama: but how far was pity for tragedy’s victims tempered by the notion of just deserts? The first Christians preached Christ Crucified: why then did it take some five hundred years before images appeared of Christ on the cross? The Massacre of the Innocents was an event that never happened: for what reasons were artists of the Italian Renaissance so eager to show it convincingly?

Enduring Creation reveals the amazing power of art to console, to warn, to prepare the viewer for the harsher experiences of life, raising intriguing questions: Can pain be beautiful? Do we always pity suffering? Are sainthood and sadomasochism linked? This compelling study concludes with a positive message of hope for the enduring human spirit.